Natasja Oerlemans
- Ecology top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 10%
- Co-authors
- Richard McLellanJan Willem ErismanN.J.M. van EekerenChris KoopmansJ. de WitBen J. KoksBerry van der HoornChris van Swaay
- Topics
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services (2 papers)Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis (1 paper)Environmental Conservation and Management (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsTanzaniaFrance
In The Last Decade
Natasja Oerlemans
6 papers receiving 396 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Ecology 125
- Global and Planetary Change 96
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 82
- Ecological Modeling 59
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 53
Countries citing papers authored by Natasja Oerlemans
This map shows the geographic impact of Natasja Oerlemans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasja Oerlemans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasja Oerlemans more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natasja Oerlemans
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasja Oerlemans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasja Oerlemans. The network helps show where Natasja Oerlemans may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasja Oerlemans
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasja Oerlemans. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasja Oerlemans based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasja Oerlemans. Natasja Oerlemans is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 87 | |
| 2 | 47 | |
| 3 | Living Planet Report 2014: Species and spaces, people and places | 245 |
| 4 | Zeeuwse Vlegel: A Promising Niche for Sustainable Wheat Production | 1 |
| 5 | 45 | |
| 6 | Diversiteit in Doelgroepen : naar gerichte communicatie over mineralenmanagement in de melkveehouderij | 1 |
| 7 | Agrarische natuurverenigingen in opkomst : een eerste verkenning naar natuurbeheeractiviteiten van agrarische natuurverenigingen | 1 |
About Natasja Oerlemans
Natasja Oerlemans is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Ecological Modeling and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 7 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Land Use and Ecosystem Services (2 papers), Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis (1 paper) and Environmental Conservation and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (59 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (82 citations) and Ecology (125 citations). Natasja Oerlemans has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Tanzania and France. Frequent co-authors include Richard McLellan, Jan Willem Erisman, N.J.M. van Eekeren, Chris Koopmans, J. de Wit, Ben J. Koks, Berry van der Hoorn, Chris van Swaay, A. van Strien and Richard J. T. Verweij. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production, Biological Conservation and AIMS Agriculture and Food.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.