Natasha S. Savage
- Aging top 5%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Cellular transport and secretion 2
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Fungal and yeast genetics research 8
- Plant Reproductive Biology 8
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms 5
- Biophysics top 10%
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques 2
- Plant Science top 10%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 4
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 3
-
- Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications 1
- Co-authors
- Daniel J. LewTrevin R. ZylaAnita T. LaytonAndrew B. GoryachevAudrey S. HowellChi‐Fang WuSatoshi OkadaTimothy C. Elston
- Cited by
- AgingCell BiologyMolecular Biology
- Journals
- Current Biology (4 papers)Science Advances (2 papers)Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Natasha S. Savage
17 papers receiving 853 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Aging 42
- Cell Biology 378
- Molecular Biology 708
- Biophysics 38
- Plant Science 204
Countries citing papers authored by Natasha S. Savage
This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha S. Savage's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha S. Savage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha S. Savage more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha S. Savage
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha S. Savage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha S. Savage. The network helps show where Natasha S. Savage may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natasha S. Savage, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 45 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 56 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 111 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 86 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 63 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 100 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 138 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 73 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 18 | 1981 | 4 |
About Natasha S. Savage
Natasha S. Savage is a scholar working on Aging, Biophysics, Cell Biology, Endocrinology and Molecular Biology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 855 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fungal and yeast genetics research (8 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (8 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (5 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (4 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (3 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (2 papers) and Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (42 citations), Cell Biology (378 citations), Molecular Biology (708 citations), Biophysics (38 citations) and Plant Science (204 citations). Natasha S. Savage has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Lew, Trevin R. Zyla, Anita T. Layton, Andrew B. Goryachev, Audrey S. Howell, Chi‐Fang Wu, Satoshi Okada, Timothy C. Elston, Erfei Bi and Marcin Leda. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Science Advances, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, The Journal of Cell Biology and PLoS Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.