Jian-geng Chiou

537 total citations
10 papers, 307 citations indexed

About

Jian-geng Chiou is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jian-geng Chiou has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 307 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 2 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Jian-geng Chiou's work include Fungal and yeast genetics research (5 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (3 papers). Jian-geng Chiou is often cited by papers focused on Fungal and yeast genetics research (5 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (3 papers). Jian-geng Chiou collaborates with scholars based in United States, Spain and United Kingdom. Jian-geng Chiou's co-authors include Daniel J. Lew, Mohan K. Balasubramanian, Timothy C. Elston, Denis Tsygankov, Trevin R. Zyla, David G. Schaeffer, Thomas P. Witelski, Leticia Galera-Laporta, Jordi García‐Ojalvo and Gürol M. Süel and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Biophysical Journal and Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology.

In The Last Decade

Jian-geng Chiou

10 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jian-geng Chiou United States	6	250	138	45	34	22	10	307
Jayme Johnson United States	5	247 1.0×	120 0.9×	51 1.1×	17 0.5×	18 0.8×	7	312
Benjamin L. Woods United States	9	311 1.2×	186 1.3×	42 0.9×	8 0.2×	19 0.9×	10	382
Maitreyi Das United States	11	396 1.6×	290 2.1×	55 1.2×	18 0.5×	24 1.1×	24	450
Alexandros Papagiannakis United States	7	249 1.0×	51 0.4×	38 0.8×	6 0.2×	13 0.6×	12	299
Laura Merlini Switzerland	13	440 1.8×	175 1.3×	56 1.2×	7 0.2×	29 1.3×	21	485
Fred Kippert United Kingdom	12	261 1.0×	41 0.3×	145 3.2×	23 0.7×	87 4.0×	23	415
Natasha S. Savage United Kingdom	13	708 2.8×	378 2.7×	204 4.5×	41 1.2×	79 3.6×	18	855
Stephanie Ballweg Germany	5	323 1.3×	100 0.7×	23 0.5×		17 0.8×	5	414
Archana G. Chavan United States	10	316 1.3×	38 0.3×	84 1.9×	3 0.1×	81 3.7×	19	408
Denis A. Kiktev Russia	11	463 1.9×	61 0.4×	38 0.8×	2 0.1×	26 1.2×	14	500

Countries citing papers authored by Jian-geng Chiou

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jian-geng Chiou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jian-geng Chiou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jian-geng Chiou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jian-geng Chiou

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jian-geng Chiou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jian-geng Chiou. The network helps show where Jian-geng Chiou may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jian-geng Chiou

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jian-geng Chiou. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jian-geng Chiou based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jian-geng Chiou. Jian-geng Chiou is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Chiou, Jian-geng, et al.. (2023). A segmentation clock patterns cellular differentiation in a bacterial biofilm. Biophysical Journal. 122(3). 412a–412a. 1 indexed citations

2.

Chiou, Jian-geng, et al.. (2023). A clock and wavefront mechanism organizes cell types in a bacterial biofilm. Biophysical Journal. 122(3). 538a–539a. 1 indexed citations

3.

Chiou, Jian-geng, et al.. (2022). A segmentation clock patterns cellular differentiation in a bacterial biofilm. Cell. 185(1). 145–157.e13. 39 indexed citations

4.

Chiou, Jian-geng, et al.. (2021). How cells determine the number of polarity sites. eLife. 10. 15 indexed citations

5.

Wu, Chi‐Fang, Trevin R. Zyla, Timothy C. Elston, et al.. (2020). Role of competition between polarity sites in establishing a unique front. UNC Libraries. 1 indexed citations

6.

Chiou, Jian-geng, et al.. (2018). Principles that govern competition or co-existence in Rho-GTPase driven polarization. PLoS Computational Biology. 14(4). e1006095–e1006095. 48 indexed citations

7.

Lai, Helen C., et al.. (2018). Temporal regulation of morphogenetic events inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 29(17). 2069–2083. 21 indexed citations

8.

Chiou, Jian-geng, Mohan K. Balasubramanian, & Daniel J. Lew. (2017). Cell Polarity in Yeast. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 33(1). 1 indexed citations

9.

Chiou, Jian-geng, Mohan K. Balasubramanian, & Daniel J. Lew. (2017). Cell Polarity in Yeast. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 33(1). 77–101. 135 indexed citations

10.

Wu, Chi‐Fang, Jian-geng Chiou, Benjamin L. Woods, et al.. (2015). Role of competition between polarity sites in establishing a unique front. eLife. 4. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact