Natasha E. Lane

21 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers

Natasha E. Lane
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 85
  • General Health Professions 218
  • Health 45
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 78
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 116
Replace Sophie Hogeveen with:
Sophie Hogeveen Canada
C. Patterson Canada
Joanna Kubisiak United States
James MacDonald United States
Daniel Gilden United States
Irena Stijacic‐Cenzer United States
Carole Seigel United States
Fallon Chipidza United States
Mariken Stegmann Netherlands
Wyatt P. Bensken United States
Natasha E. Lane relative to Sophie Hogeveen Canada Sophie Hogeveen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Sophie Hogeveen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha E. Lane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha E. Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha E. Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha E. Lane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha E. Lane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha E. Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha E. Lane. The network helps show where Natasha E. Lane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natasha E. Lane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natasha E. Lane Line = papers co-authored together Natasha E. Lane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017119
2 200591
3 202068
4 201550
5 202131
6 201722
7 202215
8 201812
9 20207
10 20156
11 20216
12 20115
13 20234
14 20234
15 20124
16 20223
17 20233
18 20092
19 20241
20 20251

About Natasha E. Lane

Natasha E. Lane is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Epidemiology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (12 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (5 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (85 citations), General Health Professions (218 citations), Health (45 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (78 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (116 citations). Natasha E. Lane has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Walter P. Wodchis, Susan E. Bronskill, Colleen J. Maxwell, Andrea Gruneir, David B. Hogan, Luke Mondor, Gerhard Gebauer, Erich‐Franz Solomayer, Tanja Fehm and Songdong Meng. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, BMC Geriatrics, Gerontology and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact