Natasha Carver

462 citations
29 papers · 255 indexed · h-index 8

Natasha Carver

22 papers receiving 228 citations

Peers

Natasha Carver
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Gender Studies 36
  • Artificial Intelligence 80
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 71
  • Computer Networks and Communications 45
  • Management Information Systems 14
Replace Pedro Vieira‐Marques with:
Pedro Vieira‐Marques Portugal
Jeffrey Potter Canada
Dean Hendrix United States
Luís Fernando Morales Morante Spain
Belén Vela Spain
Maria Chiara Pettenati Italy
Luis Kun United States
Maqbool Ali South Korea
Terence Chen Australia
Natasha Carver relative to Pedro Vieira‐Marques Portugal Pedro Vieira‐Marques's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Pedro Vieira‐Marques · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Carver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Carver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Carver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Carver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Carver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Carver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Carver. The network helps show where Natasha Carver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Natasha Carver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natasha Carver Line = papers co-authored together Natasha Carver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20260
2 20253
3 20241
4 20237
5 20234
6 202215
7 20226
8
Marriage, Gender and Refugee Migration: Spousal relationships among Somali Muslims in the UK
20212
9 20214
10 202025
11 20198
12
“Stigmatising” and “traumatising” approaches to FGM-safeguarding need urgent review
20192
13 201616
14
Country Guideline Cases: Benign and Practical?
20041
15
Home Office Country Assessments - An Analysis
20032
16
Evolution of the GPGP/TÆMS Domain-Independent
20021
17 20022
18 19944
19 199328
20 19901

About Natasha Carver

Natasha Carver is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Linguistics and Language, having authored 29 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (10 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (4 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (3 papers), Genital Health and Disease (3 papers) and Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (36 citations), Artificial Intelligence (80 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (71 citations). Natasha Carver has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Victor Lesser, Christina Pantazis, Saffron Karlsen, Alan Garvey, Bryan Horling, Ping Xuan, Rodion Podorozhny, Keith Decker, M. Yasin Akhtar Raja and Thomas Wagner. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, BMJ Open and Ethnic and Racial Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026