Nataša Mehle
- Plant Science top 2%
- Insect Science top 2%
- Endocrinology top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Horticulture top 1%
- Co-authors
- Maja RavnikarMarina DermastiaIon Gutiérrez‐AguirreDenis KutnjakStanislav TrdanKristina GrudenPetra NikolićAna Vučurović
- Topics
- Plant Virus Research Studies (37 papers)Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (34 papers)Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (33 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaApplied and Environmental MicrobiologyWater Research
- Partner nations
- SloveniaUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Nataša Mehle
68 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Plant Science 854
- Insect Science 255
- Endocrinology 191
- Molecular Biology 159
- Horticulture 138
Countries citing papers authored by Nataša Mehle
This map shows the geographic impact of Nataša Mehle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nataša Mehle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nataša Mehle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nataša Mehle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nataša Mehle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nataša Mehle. The network helps show where Nataša Mehle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nataša Mehle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nataša Mehle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nataša Mehle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nataša Mehle. Nataša Mehle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 45 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | Transmission of 'Candidatus phytoplasma mali' by natural formation of root bridges in M9 apple rootstock | 2 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | Diagnostics of fruit trees phytoplasmas â the importance of latent infections | 2 |
| 16 | European stone fruit yellows phytoplasma in Japanese plum and Myrobalan plum in Bosnia and Herzegovina. | 1 |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | HIGH INFECTION PRESSURE OF ESFY PHYTOPLASMA THREATENS THE CULTIVATION OF STONE FRUIT SPECIES | 4 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Expression of disease symptoms on different apple cultivars infected with apple proliferation phytoplasma. | 2 |
About Nataša Mehle
Nataša Mehle is a scholar working on Horticulture, Endocrinology and Plant Science, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Virus Research Studies (37 papers), Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (34 papers) and Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (33 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (138 citations), Endocrinology (191 citations) and Plant Science (854 citations). Nataša Mehle has collaborated with scholars based in Slovenia, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Maja Ravnikar, Marina Dermastia, Ion Gutiérrez‐Aguirre, Denis Kutnjak, Stanislav Trdan, Kristina Gruden, Petra Nikolić, Ana Vučurović, Anja Pecman and Rok Lenarčič. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Water Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.