Nataly Ascarrunz
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Marielos Peña‐ClarosJuan Carlos LiconaLourens PoorterE.J.M.M. AretsMarisol ToledoBryan FineganMasha T. van der SandeLeda Lorenzo Montero
- Topics
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (7 papers)Forest ecology and management (4 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Nataly Ascarrunz
11 papers receiving 662 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 457
- Global and Planetary Change 351
- Ecology 168
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 126
- Plant Science 64
Countries citing papers authored by Nataly Ascarrunz
This map shows the geographic impact of Nataly Ascarrunz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nataly Ascarrunz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nataly Ascarrunz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nataly Ascarrunz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nataly Ascarrunz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nataly Ascarrunz. The network helps show where Nataly Ascarrunz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nataly Ascarrunz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nataly Ascarrunz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nataly Ascarrunz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nataly Ascarrunz. Nataly Ascarrunz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 135 | |
| 8 | 56 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | Does functional trait diversity predict above‐ground biomass and productivity of tropical forests? Testing three alternative hypothesesbreakdown → | 306 |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 72 |
About Nataly Ascarrunz
Nataly Ascarrunz is a scholar working on Forestry, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 12 papers that have together received 673 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (7 papers), Forest ecology and management (4 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (457 citations), Global and Planetary Change (351 citations) and Ecological Modeling (51 citations). Nataly Ascarrunz has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Marielos Peña‐Claros, Juan Carlos Licona, Lourens Poorter, E.J.M.M. Arets, Marisol Toledo, Bryan Finegan, Masha T. van der Sande, Leda Lorenzo Montero, Fernando Casanoves and Marcel C. Vaz. Their work appears in journals such as Science, PLoS ONE and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.