Natalie Townsend
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Media in Health Education
-
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Papers in
- Health 4
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence 2
- Health disparities and outcomes 1
-
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility 1
- Child and Adolescent Health 1
- Co-authors
- Deborah Loxton (11 shared papers)Amy Anderson (3 shared papers)Xenia Dolja‐Gore (2 shared papers)Jennifer R. Powers (4 shared papers)Melissa L. Harris (4 shared papers)Julie Byles (4 shared papers)Gita D. Mishra (2 shared papers)Peta Forder (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (2 papers)Reproductive Health (1 paper)BMC Medical Research Methodology (1 paper)Child Abuse & Neglect (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
Natalie Townsend
11 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Health 127
- Clinical Psychology 71
- Gender Studies 23
- General Health Professions 49
- Reproductive Medicine 10
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Townsend
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Townsend's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Townsend with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Townsend more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Townsend
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Townsend. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Townsend. The network helps show where Natalie Townsend may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Townsend, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 96 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 83 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 10 | Reproductive health: contraception, conception and change of life - findings from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health | 2021 | 2 |
| 11 | Policy briefs from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health | 2019 | 1 |
About Natalie Townsend
Natalie Townsend is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research and Social Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), demographic modeling and climate adaptation (2 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper), Education Systems and Policy (1 paper), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Health (1 paper) and Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (127 citations), Clinical Psychology (71 citations), Gender Studies (23 citations), General Health Professions (49 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (10 citations). Natalie Townsend has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Deborah Loxton, Amy Anderson, Xenia Dolja‐Gore, Jennifer R. Powers, Melissa L. Harris, Julie Byles, Gita D. Mishra, Peta Forder, Alemu Sufa Melka and Catherine Chojenta. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Reproductive Health, BMC Medical Research Methodology, Child Abuse & Neglect and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.