Natalie R. Stevens
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stevan E. HobfollNancy A. HamiltonAlyson K. ZaltaChristy A. NelsonHeather KitzmanJames GerhartNicole M. HeathRachel E. Goldsmith
- Topics
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (9 papers)Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (7 papers)Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Natalie R. Stevens
29 papers receiving 983 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Clinical Psychology 546
- Social Psychology 199
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 189
- General Health Professions 178
- Sociology and Political Science 142
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie R. Stevens
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie R. Stevens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie R. Stevens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie R. Stevens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie R. Stevens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie R. Stevens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie R. Stevens. The network helps show where Natalie R. Stevens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie R. Stevens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie R. Stevens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie R. Stevens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie R. Stevens. Natalie R. Stevens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 49 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 113 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 166 | |
| 15 | 64 | |
| 16 | 51 | |
| 17 | 118 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 43 | |
| 20 | 60 |
About Natalie R. Stevens
Natalie R. Stevens is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (9 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (7 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (546 citations), Applied Psychology (77 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (189 citations). Natalie R. Stevens has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stevan E. Hobfoll, Nancy A. Hamilton, Alyson K. Zalta, Christy A. Nelson, Heather Kitzman, James Gerhart, Nicole M. Heath, Rachel E. Goldsmith, Samantha A. Chesney and Vanessa Tirone. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Aging Cell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.