Natalie Peter
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Papers in
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 7
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 2
-
- Treatment of Major Depression 5
- Co-authors
- Stefan Leucht (10 shared papers)Georgia Salanti (8 shared papers)Johannes Schneider‐Thoma (7 shared papers)Maximilian Huhn (4 shared papers)John M. Davis (4 shared papers)Adriani Nikolakopoulou (3 shared papers)Andrea Cipriani (5 shared papers)Marc Krause (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Physical Review X (1 paper)JAMA Psychiatry (1 paper)The Lancet Psychiatry (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)Systematic Reviews (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Natalie Peter
11 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Natalie Peter's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Biological Psychiatry 134
- Psychiatry and Mental health 808
- Philosophy 127
- Pharmacology 189
- Clinical Psychology 161
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Peter
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Peter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Peter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Peter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Peter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Peter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Peter. The network helps show where Natalie Peter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Peter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 32 oral antipsychotics for the acute treatment of adults with multi-episode schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 963 |
| 2 | 2021 | 44 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 2 |
About Natalie Peter
Natalie Peter is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (5 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (134 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (808 citations), Philosophy (127 citations), Pharmacology (189 citations) and Clinical Psychology (161 citations). Natalie Peter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Leucht, Georgia Salanti, Johannes Schneider‐Thoma, Maximilian Huhn, John M. Davis, Adriani Nikolakopoulou, Andrea Cipriani, Marc Krause, Myrto Samara and Thomas J. Arndt. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review X, JAMA Psychiatry, The Lancet Psychiatry, The Lancet and Systematic Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.