Natalie Pennington

1.0k total citations
29 papers, 537 citations indexed

About

Natalie Pennington is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Pennington has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 537 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in Communication and 10 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Natalie Pennington's work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (16 papers), Social Media and Politics (10 papers) and Media Influence and Health (5 papers). Natalie Pennington is often cited by papers focused on Impact of Technology on Adolescents (16 papers), Social Media and Politics (10 papers) and Media Influence and Health (5 papers). Natalie Pennington collaborates with scholars based in United States. Natalie Pennington's co-authors include Jeffrey A. Hall, Amanda J. Holmstrom, Kelly L. Winfrey, Benjamin R. Warner, Michael W. Kearney, LeAnn M. Brazeal, Jeffrey E. Hall, Andy J. Merolla, Jeffery A. Hall and Evan K. Perrault and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Computers in Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Pennington

28 papers receiving 499 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natalie Pennington United States 14 300 163 155 125 64 29 537
Erin E. Hollenbaugh United States 9 563 1.9× 206 1.3× 81 0.5× 102 0.8× 62 1.0× 10 719
Katie M. Warber United States 6 421 1.4× 137 0.8× 143 0.9× 205 1.6× 47 0.7× 7 550
Ellen Middaugh United States 15 572 1.9× 290 1.8× 69 0.4× 95 0.8× 94 1.5× 31 925
Nathan Miczo United States 9 209 0.7× 84 0.5× 60 0.4× 215 1.7× 69 1.1× 20 458
Lynne M. Webb United States 9 298 1.0× 144 0.9× 89 0.6× 173 1.4× 50 0.8× 33 555
Elliot Panek United States 11 434 1.4× 133 0.8× 159 1.0× 106 0.8× 66 1.0× 22 571
Jessica Marrington Australia 6 456 1.5× 137 0.8× 190 1.2× 174 1.4× 58 0.9× 8 670
Yossiri Yossatorn Thailand 4 530 1.8× 107 0.7× 147 0.9× 159 1.3× 52 0.8× 9 718
Traci Y. Craig United States 9 483 1.6× 118 0.7× 43 0.3× 141 1.1× 98 1.5× 20 672
Nicholas A. Palomares United States 15 321 1.1× 113 0.7× 69 0.4× 238 1.9× 122 1.9× 35 691

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Pennington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Pennington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Pennington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Pennington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Pennington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Pennington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Pennington. The network helps show where Natalie Pennington may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Pennington

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Pennington. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Pennington based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Pennington. Natalie Pennington is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hu, Junwen M., Amanda J. Holmstrom, Natalie Pennington, & Jeffrey A. Hall. (2025). What Friendship Characteristics Are Associated With Well‐Being Among Unpartnered Individuals in the United States?. Personal Relationships. 32(2). 1 indexed citations
2.
Hall, Jeffrey A., et al.. (2024). Adult sibling relationships and media multiplexity theory. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 43(1). 181–200. 1 indexed citations
3.
Pennington, Natalie, Jeffrey A. Hall, & Amanda J. Holmstrom. (2024). The American Friendship Project: A report on the status and health of friendship in America. PLoS ONE. 19(7). e0305834–e0305834. 3 indexed citations
4.
5.
Pennington, Natalie, et al.. (2023). An exploration of esports fan identity, engagement practices, and motives. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11. 100081–100081. 4 indexed citations
6.
Hall, Jeffrey A., et al.. (2023). Quality Conversation Can Increase Daily Well-Being. Communication Research. 52(3). 291–315. 3 indexed citations
7.
Pennington, Natalie, et al.. (2023). Examining How Social and Emotional Factors Inform Response to Cross-Cutting Political Views on Social Media. Social Media + Society. 9(4). 2 indexed citations
8.
Pennington, Natalie, et al.. (2023). Social interaction, support preferences, and the use of wearable health trackers. Frontiers in Communication. 8. 1 indexed citations
9.
Pennington, Natalie. (2021). The Maintenance of Dormant and Commemorative Ties by Young Adults through Social Media. Southern Communication Journal. 86(3). 244–255. 3 indexed citations
10.
Pennington, Natalie. (2021). Communication outside of the home through social media during COVID-19. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 4. 100118–100118. 39 indexed citations
11.
Pennington, Natalie, Amanda J. Holmstrom, & Jeffrey A. Hall. (2021). The Toll of Technology while Working from Home during COVID-19. Communication Reports. 35(1). 25–37. 25 indexed citations
12.
Holmstrom, Amanda J., Jeffrey A. Hall, & Natalie Pennington. (2021). Thriving or struggling? Social energy expenditure and patterns of interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Communication Studies. 73(2). 101–118. 5 indexed citations
13.
Pennington, Natalie. (2020). Quitting social media: a qualitative exploration of communication outcomes. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication. 22(1). 30–38. 16 indexed citations
14.
Pennington, Natalie & Jeffrey A. Hall. (2020). Does Facebook-enabled communication influence weak-tie relationships over time? A longitudinal investigation into mediated relationship maintenance. Communication Monographs. 88(1). 48–70. 11 indexed citations
15.
Pennington, Natalie & Kelly L. Winfrey. (2020). Engaging in Political Talk on Facebook: Investigating the Role of Interpersonal Goals and Cognitive Engagement. Communication Studies. 72(1). 100–114. 7 indexed citations
16.
Brazeal, LeAnn M., et al.. (2018). Is Civility Contagious? Examining the Impact of Modeling in Online Political Discussions. Social Media + Society. 4(3). 22 indexed citations
17.
Pennington, Natalie & Jeffrey A. Hall. (2014). An analysis of humor orientation on Facebook: A lens model approach. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research. 27(1). 1–21. 16 indexed citations
18.
Pennington, Natalie. (2014). Social Media and Democracy: Innovations in Participatory Politics. European Journal of Communication. 29(2). 251–254. 21 indexed citations
19.
Pennington, Natalie. (2013). You Don't De-Friend the Dead: An Analysis of Grief Communication by College Students Through Facebook Profiles. Death Studies. 37(7). 617–635. 53 indexed citations
20.
Pennington, Natalie. (2013). Facebook Democracy: The Architecture of Disclosure and the Threat to Public Life. European Journal of Communication. 28(2). 208–210. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026