Sarah Wright

74 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

Co-becoming Bawaka 2015 · 305 citations
3052015202620182022100200300

Peers

Sarah Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Geography, Planning and Development 688
  • Health 345
  • Cultural Studies 216
  • Anthropology 232
  • Sociology and Political Science 926
Replace Sandie Suchet‐Pearson with:
Sandie Suchet‐Pearson Australia
K. Wayne Yang United States
Deborah Bird Rose Australia
Bronislaw Szerszynski United Kingdom
Glen Coulthard Canada
Bruce Braun United States
Aileen Moreton‐Robinson Australia
Lorenzo Veracini Australia
Juanita Sundberg Canada
Taiaiake Alfred Canada
Sarah Wright relative to Sandie Suchet‐Pearson Australia Sandie Suchet‐Pearson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sandie Suchet‐Pearson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Wright. The network helps show where Sarah Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Wright Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Co-becoming Bawaka
Hit paper breakdown →
2015305
2 2014176
3 2013173
4 2014153
5 2009122
6 201299
7 201870
8 201068
9 201866
10 201261
11 201958
12 201040
13 202137
14 201437
15 201037
16 202034
17
Songspirals: Sharing Women's Wisdom of Country Through Songlines
201932
18 201232
19 201332
20 200931

About Sarah Wright

Sarah Wright is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Health, Anthropology, Life-span and Life-course Studies and Museology, having authored 75 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (19 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (14 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (12 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (8 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (5 papers), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (5 papers), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (4 papers) and Museums and Cultural Heritage (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (688 citations), Health (345 citations), Cultural Studies (216 citations), Anthropology (232 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (926 citations). Sarah Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Kate Lloyd, Sandie Suchet‐Pearson, Laklak Burarrwanga, Bawaka Country, Djawundil Maymuru, Ritjilili Ganambarr, Banbapuy Ganambarr, Merrkiyawuy Ganambarr‐Stubbs, Kathleen Mee and Matalena Tofa. Their work appears in journals such as Social & Cultural Geography, Australian Geographer, Third World Quarterly, Geographical Research and Political Geography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026