Natalie Moitt

827 citations
8 papers · 437 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Natalie Moitt

8 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers

Natalie Moitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 41
  • Oncology 91
  • Otorhinolaryngology 14
  • Cancer Research 31
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 64
Replace Zhenyu Pan with:
Zhenyu Pan China
Ronald C. Eldridge United States
Ceri White United Kingdom
Sheray N. Chin Jamaica
Xiaoqin Cao China
Lisa M. Moy United States
Lorraine Boyd United States
Maggiorino Barbero Italy
Kimberly A. Herget United States
Xinyu Wang China
Natalie Moitt relative to Zhenyu Pan China Zhenyu Pan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Zhenyu Pan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Moitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Moitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Moitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Moitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Moitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Moitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Moitt. The network helps show where Natalie Moitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Moitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Moitt Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Moitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2016358
2 202122
3
National Maternity and Perinatal Audit: Clinical report 2019. Based on births in NHS maternity services between 1 April 2016 and 31 March 2017
201919
4
Maternity admissions to intensive care in England, Wales and Scotland in 2015/16: A report from the National Maternity and Perinatal Audit.
201912
5
National Maternity and Perinatal Audit: Organisational Report 2017
201712
6 202111
7 20212
8
Technical Report: linking the National Maternity and Perinatal Audit Data Set to the National Neonatal Research Database for 2015/16
20191

About Natalie Moitt

Natalie Moitt is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Health Information Management and Oncology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers), Medical Coding and Health Information (1 paper), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 paper), Global Maternal and Child Health (1 paper), Birth, Development, and Health (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (41 citations), Oncology (91 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (14 citations), Cancer Research (31 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (64 citations). Natalie Moitt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Kelley M. Stewart, Dharmintra Pasupathy, Jennifer Jardine, Jane Hawdon, Tina Harris, Ipek Gurol‐Urganci, Fran Carroll, Jan van der Meulen, Hannah Knight and Matias C. Vieira. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, British Journal of Cancer, Trials and DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact