Natalie Lippa

7.1k citations
14 papers · 5.5k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 7
Topics
Genomics and Rare Diseases (7 papers)Epilepsy research and treatment (4 papers)Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (4 papers)

In The Last Decade

Natalie Lippa

12 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Hit Papers

Impact of Informing Overweight Individuals about the Role...2013202620172021201310002.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k

Peers

Natalie Lippa
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Clinical Psychology 2.4k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.4k
  • Pharmacy 1.3k
  • Social Psychology 1.1k
  • General Health Professions 847
Replace Alison E. Field with:
Alison E. Field United States
Martin Teufel Germany
Anne E. Becker United States
Brenda B. Toner Canada
Carolyn Black Becker United States
Helen Truby Australia
Charles W. Lidz United States
George Szmukler United Kingdom
Natalie Slopen United States
Pauline W. Jansen Netherlands
Natalie Lippa relative to Alison E. Field United States Alison E. Field's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Alison E. Field · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Lippa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Lippa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Lippa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Lippa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Lippa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Lippa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Lippa. The network helps show where Natalie Lippa may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Lippa

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Lippa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Lippa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Lippa. Natalie Lippa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 3
3 10
4 52
5 3
6 0
7 5
8 7
9 5
10 70
11 90
12 4
13
Impact of Informing Overweight Individuals about the Role of Genetics in Obesity: An Online Experimental Studybreakdown →
5188
14 29

About Natalie Lippa

Natalie Lippa is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Psychiatry and Mental health and Genetics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Rare Diseases (7 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (4 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (1.3k citations), Clinical Psychology (2.4k citations) and Applied Psychology (327 citations). Natalie Lippa has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Saskia C. Sanderson, Melissa Wasserstein, Margaret M. McGovern, Emilia Bagiella, Edward H. Schuchman, Robert J. Desnick, Lacey Smith, Beth Rosen Sheidley, Jennifer Malinowski and Nephi Walton. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, Obesity and Journal of Medical Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026