Natalie Kretsch

727 citations
18 papers · 516 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Natalie Kretsch

18 papers receiving 498 citations

Peers

Natalie Kretsch
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Applied Psychology 55
  • Clinical Psychology 155
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 207
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 90
  • General Decision Sciences 11
Replace Christos Kouimtsidis with:
Christos Kouimtsidis United Kingdom
Mark A. Belding United States
Shira Goldberg Israel
Ellen Vedel Netherlands
Doris Ogden United States
Abigail Matthews United States
Sarah D. Lynne‐Landsman United States
Nicola Lester United States
Steven J. Lash United States
Kitty S. Harris United States
Natalie Kretsch relative to Christos Kouimtsidis United Kingdom Christos Kouimtsidis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Christos Kouimtsidis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Kretsch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Kretsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Kretsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Kretsch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Kretsch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Kretsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Kretsch. The network helps show where Natalie Kretsch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Kretsch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Kretsch Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Kretsch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
Collaborative Care of Opioid-Addicted Patients in Primary Care Using Buprenorphine
20171
2 201650
3 201622
4 20154
5 201511
6 20153
7 201523
8 201458
9 201412
10 201416
11 201423
12 20138
13 20137
14 201313
15 20137
16 201319
17 201124
18 2011215

About Natalie Kretsch

Natalie Kretsch is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (2 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (55 citations), Clinical Psychology (155 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (207 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (90 citations) and General Decision Sciences (11 citations). Natalie Kretsch has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include K. Paige Harden, Daniel P. Alford, Michael Winter, Colleen LaBelle, Jeffrey H. Samet, Michael Botticelli, Elliot M. Tucker–Drob, Jennifer L. Tackett, Frank D. Mann and Jane Mendle. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Journal of Research on Adolescence, International Journal of Eating Disorders, Emerging Adulthood and Journal of Research in Personality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026