Natalie Harker
About
In The Last Decade
Natalie Harker
6 papers receiving 284 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Plant Science 293
- Genetics 157
- Molecular Biology 57
- Agronomy and Crop Science 32
- Cell Biology 15
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Harker
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Harker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Harker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Harker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Harker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Harker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Harker. The network helps show where Natalie Harker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Harker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Harker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Harker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Harker. Natalie Harker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 133 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 111 | |
| 5 | 47 | |
| 6 | Diagnosis of inherited myopathies by molecular methods | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.