Natalie H. Chapman
- Plant Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Genetics
- Food Science
- Co-authors
- Graham B. SeymourCathie MartinLars ØstergaardSandra KnappGerco C. AngenentRumyana KarlovaRuud A. de MaagdKarine David
- Topics
- Plant Gene Expression Analysis (4 papers)Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (3 papers)Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (3 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPLANT PHYSIOLOGYAnnual Review of Plant Biology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Natalie H. Chapman
12 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Plant Science 1.3k
- Molecular Biology 894
- Biochemistry 124
- Genetics 88
- Food Science 67
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie H. Chapman
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie H. Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie H. Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie H. Chapman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie H. Chapman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie H. Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie H. Chapman. The network helps show where Natalie H. Chapman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie H. Chapman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie H. Chapman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie H. Chapman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie H. Chapman. Natalie H. Chapman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Exploring the Effects of Tomato Extract Supplementation on Cognitive Function during Exercise and at Rest | 1 |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 261 | |
| 5 | 265 | |
| 6 | 173 | |
| 7 | Fruit Development and Ripeningbreakdown → | 491 |
| 8 | 73 | |
| 9 | 152 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 33 |
About Natalie H. Chapman
Natalie H. Chapman is a scholar working on Plant Science, Biochemistry and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Gene Expression Analysis (4 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (3 papers) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.3k citations), Horticulture (30 citations) and Biochemistry (124 citations). Natalie H. Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Graham B. Seymour, Cathie Martin, Lars Østergaard, Sandra Knapp, Gerco C. Angenent, Rumyana Karlova, Ruud A. de Maagd, Karine David, Bee Lynn Chew and Jocelyn K. C. Rose. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and Annual Review of Plant Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.