Natalie E. Scholpa
- Molecular Biology
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Physiology
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- Rick G. SchnellmannBrian S. CummingsDaniel CorumDouglas G. TilleyPatrick G. SullivanHeather A. BogerStephen TomlinsonAlexander G. Rabchevsky
- Topics
- Spinal Cord Injury Research (9 papers)Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (5 papers)Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Molecular SciencesKidney InternationalJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceTürkiye
In The Last Decade
Natalie E. Scholpa
27 papers receiving 493 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Molecular Biology 241
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 156
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 85
- Physiology 78
- Neurology 67
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie E. Scholpa
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie E. Scholpa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie E. Scholpa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie E. Scholpa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie E. Scholpa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie E. Scholpa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie E. Scholpa. The network helps show where Natalie E. Scholpa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie E. Scholpa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie E. Scholpa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie E. Scholpa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie E. Scholpa. Natalie E. Scholpa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 84 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 90 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Natalie E. Scholpa
Natalie E. Scholpa is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Emergency Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 498 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (9 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (5 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (156 citations), Neurology (50 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (25 citations). Natalie E. Scholpa has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Rick G. Schnellmann, Brian S. Cummings, Daniel Corum, Douglas G. Tilley, Patrick G. Sullivan, Heather A. Boger, Stephen Tomlinson, Alexander G. Rabchevsky, John J. Wagner and Wenxue Wang. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Kidney International and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.