Natalie Dorà

454 citations
13 papers · 351 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Natalie Dorà

13 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Natalie Dorà
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 164
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 131
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 57
  • Reproductive Medicine 17
  • Molecular Biology 130
Replace Soumaya Mougou with:
Soumaya Mougou Tunisia
Matthew H. Kaufman United Kingdom
Katarzyna Janik-Papis Poland
Shirley R. Bruce United States
Nicholas B. Blackburn Australia
Abin Abraham United States
Masaki Hara Japan
Masatoshi Ooga Japan
Tracy M. Clement United States
F.E.M. Rebers Netherlands
Natalie Dorà relative to Soumaya Mougou Tunisia Soumaya Mougou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Soumaya Mougou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Dorà

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Dorà's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Dorà with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Dorà more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Dorà

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Dorà. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Dorà. The network helps show where Natalie Dorà may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Dorà, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Dorà Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Dorà links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200894
2 201256
3 200845
4 201545
5 201431
6 201121
7
Interaction between hedgehog signalling and PAX6 dosage mediates maintenance and regeneration of the corneal epithelium.
201220
8 201616
9 200913
10 20184
11 20213
12 20162
13 20161

About Natalie Dorà

Natalie Dorà is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology and Genetics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal Surgery and Treatments (10 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (4 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (4 papers), Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (3 papers), Ocular Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (164 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (131 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (57 citations), Reproductive Medicine (17 citations) and Molecular Biology (130 citations). Natalie Dorà has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include John D. West, J. Martin Collinson, Robert E. Hill, Panagiotis Douvaras, Richard L. Mort, Romana Kucerova, Paul Fowler, Richard M. Sharpe, S. M. Rhind and Jingxing Ou. Their work appears in journals such as Stem Cell Research, PLoS ONE, Experimental Eye Research, Molecular Human Reproduction and PLoS Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact