Natalie Chandler

65 total papers · 2.3k total citations
37 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Natalie Chandler is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Chandler has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 15 papers in Molecular Biology and 14 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Natalie Chandler's work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (16 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (8 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (8 papers). Natalie Chandler is often cited by papers focused on Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (16 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (8 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (8 papers). Natalie Chandler collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Natalie Chandler's co-authors include Lyn S. Chitty, Halina Dobrzynski, Mark R. Boyett, Robert H. Anderson, Elizabeth Scotchman, Rhiannon Mellis, Joseph Yanni, Ian D. Greener, James O. Tellez and Hanny Musa and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, Nature Immunology and Clinical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Chandler

33 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Natalie Chandler 435 379 375 264 116 37 1.1k
Juan J. Heinrich 134 0.3× 469 1.2× 122 0.3× 541 2.0× 114 1.0× 35 1.5k
Carol Saunders 119 0.3× 740 2.0× 109 0.3× 631 2.4× 72 0.6× 59 1.3k
P. Colosi 120 0.3× 857 2.3× 98 0.3× 690 2.6× 70 0.6× 21 1.4k
Ana Lía Taratuto 155 0.4× 400 1.1× 139 0.4× 73 0.3× 87 0.8× 42 1.1k
P. Gallano 261 0.6× 1.0k 2.6× 158 0.4× 285 1.1× 94 0.8× 65 1.4k
Shailesh Y. Desai 90 0.2× 450 1.2× 256 0.7× 95 0.4× 98 0.8× 27 1.4k
Marie van Dijk 67 0.2× 432 1.1× 523 1.4× 130 0.5× 156 1.3× 48 1.4k
Gurbax S. Sekhon 68 0.2× 596 1.6× 121 0.3× 521 2.0× 71 0.6× 42 1.1k
K. E. Davies 190 0.4× 796 2.1× 92 0.2× 222 0.8× 135 1.2× 38 1.2k
Emma Clement 244 0.6× 966 2.5× 53 0.1× 292 1.1× 85 0.7× 36 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Chandler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Chandler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Chandler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Chandler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Chandler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Chandler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Chandler. The network helps show where Natalie Chandler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Chandler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Chandler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Chandler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Chandler. Natalie Chandler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026