Natalie Castriotta
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Health top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michelle G. CraskeEric J. LenzeMelinda A. StanleyKate Wolitzky‐TaylorCatherine R. AyersEmmanuel P. EspejoMary E. DozierKatharina Kircanski
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (4 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Neuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyClinical Psychology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Natalie Castriotta
9 papers receiving 629 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Clinical Psychology 334
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 305
- Social Psychology 129
- Health 103
- Psychiatry and Mental health 95
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Castriotta
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Castriotta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Castriotta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Castriotta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Castriotta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Castriotta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Castriotta. The network helps show where Natalie Castriotta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Castriotta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Castriotta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Castriotta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Castriotta. Natalie Castriotta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 89 | |
| 10 | 450 |
About Natalie Castriotta
Natalie Castriotta is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Sensory Systems, having authored 10 papers that have together received 652 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (4 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (46 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (305 citations) and Clinical Psychology (334 citations). Natalie Castriotta has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michelle G. Craske, Eric J. Lenze, Melinda A. Stanley, Kate Wolitzky‐Taylor, Catherine R. Ayers, Emmanuel P. Espejo, Mary E. Dozier, Katharina Kircanski, Aaron S. Baker and Jayson L. Mystkowski. Their work appears in journals such as Depression and Anxiety, Journal of Anxiety Disorders and Cognitive Therapy and Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.