Julia Kasl‐Godley
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Margaret GatzIan A. CookMichelle AbramsJennifer J. DunkinAndrew F. LeuchterSusan Rosenberg-ThompsonMichele J. KarelAntonette M. Zeiss
- Topics
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers)Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Neuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyPsychiatry and Mental healthClinical Psychology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Julia Kasl‐Godley
11 papers receiving 671 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Psychiatry and Mental health 264
- Clinical Psychology 251
- General Health Professions 140
- Cognitive Neuroscience 132
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 128
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Kasl‐Godley
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Kasl‐Godley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Kasl‐Godley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Kasl‐Godley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Kasl‐Godley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Kasl‐Godley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Kasl‐Godley. The network helps show where Julia Kasl‐Godley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Kasl‐Godley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Kasl‐Godley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Kasl‐Godley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Kasl‐Godley. Julia Kasl‐Godley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | |
| 2 | End-of-life issues, grief, and bereavement : what clinicians need to know | 6 |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | 54 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 112 | |
| 7 | 187 | |
| 8 | Empirically validated psychological treatments for older adults. | 131 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 49 | |
| 11 | Aging and mental disorders. | 65 |
About Julia Kasl‐Godley
Julia Kasl‐Godley is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Pharmacy and Clinical Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 737 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (57 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (264 citations) and Clinical Psychology (251 citations). Julia Kasl‐Godley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Gatz, Ian A. Cook, Michelle Abrams, Jennifer J. Dunkin, Andrew F. Leuchter, Susan Rosenberg-Thompson, Michele J. Karel, Antonette M. Zeiss, Brian Kaskie and Todd McCallum. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, Clinical Psychology Review and Journal of Affective Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.