Natalie Bullock
About
In The Last Decade
Natalie Bullock
3 papers receiving 78 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Molecular Biology 48
- Genetics 27
- Food Science 26
- Nutrition and Dietetics 19
- Gastroenterology 16
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Bullock
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Bullock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Bullock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Bullock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Bullock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Bullock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Bullock. The network helps show where Natalie Bullock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Bullock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Bullock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Bullock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Bullock. Natalie Bullock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | Comparative composition of bacteria in the human intestinal microflora during remission and active ulcerative colitis. | 64 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.