Natalie Abrams
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 10%
-
- Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Papers in ⓘ
- Oncology 6
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis 3
-
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 2
- Co-authors
- William C. Nierman (3 shared papers)Jaeyoung Choi (1 shared paper)Jongsun Park (1 shared paper)Seogchan Kang (1 shared paper)Bong Soo Park (1 shared paper)Yong‐Hwan Lee (1 shared paper)Ralph A. Dean (2 shared papers)Liliana Losada (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Pancreas (2 papers)The Journal of Immunology (2 papers)Nature Communications (1 paper)Journal of Ambulatory Care Management (1 paper)Nursing Forum (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Natalie Abrams
19 papers receiving 670 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Health Informatics 14
- Cell Biology 96
- Plant Science 199
- Pharmacology 87
- Molecular Biology 303
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Abrams
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Abrams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Abrams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Abrams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Abrams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Abrams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Abrams. The network helps show where Natalie Abrams may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Abrams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 127 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 99 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 96 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 61 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1978 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1979 | 2 | |
| 18 | A contrary view of the nurse as patient advocate. | 1990 | 2 |
| 19 | 1982 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1977 | 1 |
About Natalie Abrams
Natalie Abrams is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology, General Health Professions, Plant Science and Cancer Research, having authored 20 papers that have together received 684 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (4 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (3 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (2 papers), Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (14 citations), Cell Biology (96 citations), Plant Science (199 citations), Pharmacology (87 citations) and Molecular Biology (303 citations). Natalie Abrams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Australia. Frequent co-authors include William C. Nierman, Jaeyoung Choi, Jongsun Park, Seogchan Kang, Bong Soo Park, Yong‐Hwan Lee, Ralph A. Dean, Liliana Losada, Pushpa Tandon and Mercy PrabhuDas. Their work appears in journals such as Pancreas, The Journal of Immunology, Nature Communications, Journal of Ambulatory Care Management and Nursing Forum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.