Natalia Pessacg
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Water Science and Technology top 10%
- Ecology
- Ocean Engineering
- Co-authors
- Silvina A. SolmanMiguel PascualLaurent LiDaniela JacobEnrique SánchezManuel de CastroHervé Le TreutJosé A. Marengo
- Topics
- Climate variability and models (9 papers)Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (7 papers)Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Natalia Pessacg
16 papers receiving 430 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Global and Planetary Change 360
- Atmospheric Science 233
- Water Science and Technology 109
- Ecology 50
- Ocean Engineering 35
Countries citing papers authored by Natalia Pessacg
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalia Pessacg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalia Pessacg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalia Pessacg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalia Pessacg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalia Pessacg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalia Pessacg. The network helps show where Natalia Pessacg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalia Pessacg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalia Pessacg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalia Pessacg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalia Pessacg. Natalia Pessacg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 66 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | Un río, todas las aguas: El Río Chubut, nexo entre ambiente y sociedad. | 2 |
| 8 | 86 | |
| 9 | 150 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | Impacts of land use changes over southern South American climate: a modeling study using the MM5 regional model | 1 |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 43 |
About Natalia Pessacg
Natalia Pessacg is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science and Water Science and Technology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate variability and models (9 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (7 papers) and Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (360 citations), Atmospheric Science (233 citations) and Water Science and Technology (109 citations). Natalia Pessacg has collaborated with scholars based in Argentina, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Silvina A. Solman, Miguel Pascual, Laurent Li, Daniela Jacob, Enrique Sánchez, Manuel de Castro, Hervé Le Treut, José A. Marengo, Rosmeri Porfírio da Rocha and Armelle Reca Remedio. Their work appears in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Climatic Change and Climate Dynamics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.