Natacha P. Chacoff
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 1%
- Insect Science top 1%
- Genetics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Diego P. VázquezLuciano CagnoloNico BlüthgenMarcelo A. AizenErica L. StevaniJimena DoradoSilvia B. LomáscoloDaniel Garcı́a
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (39 papers)Plant Parasitism and Resistance (31 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (21 papers)
- Cited by
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsNature and Landscape ConservationInsect Science
- Partner nations
- ArgentinaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Natacha P. Chacoff
48 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.9k
- Plant Science 1.3k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.1k
- Insect Science 460
- Genetics 372
Countries citing papers authored by Natacha P. Chacoff
This map shows the geographic impact of Natacha P. Chacoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natacha P. Chacoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natacha P. Chacoff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natacha P. Chacoff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natacha P. Chacoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natacha P. Chacoff. The network helps show where Natacha P. Chacoff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natacha P. Chacoff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natacha P. Chacoff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natacha P. Chacoff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natacha P. Chacoff. Natacha P. Chacoff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | Los polinizadores en la agricultura | 1 |
| 16 | 67 | |
| 17 | 84 | |
| 18 | Uniting pattern and process in plant–animal mutualistic networks: a reviewbreakdown → | 458 |
| 19 | 326 | |
| 20 | 112 |
About Natacha P. Chacoff
Natacha P. Chacoff is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Insect Science, having authored 50 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (39 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (31 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.9k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.1k citations) and Insect Science (460 citations). Natacha P. Chacoff has collaborated with scholars based in Argentina, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Diego P. Vázquez, Luciano Cagnolo, Nico Blüthgen, Marcelo A. Aizen, Erica L. Stevani, Jimena Dorado, Silvia B. Lomáscolo, Daniel Garcı́a, Benigno Padrón and Julian Resasco. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.