Nat Pernick

10 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers

Nat Pernick
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Cancer Research 95
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 93
  • Dermatology 36
  • Oncology 85
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 45
Replace Amna Khurshid with:
Amna Khurshid Pakistan
Ali Ibrahim Sevınç Türkiye
Leo A. Niemeier United States
Gordana Pupić Serbia
Nagayoshi Ohta Japan
Ashraf Patel United Kingdom
Jung Han Yoon South Korea
Seog Yun Park South Korea
Roger Christian United States
Sachiko Nagumo Japan
Nat Pernick relative to Amna Khurshid Pakistan Amna Khurshid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Amna Khurshid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nat Pernick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nat Pernick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nat Pernick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nat Pernick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nat Pernick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nat Pernick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nat Pernick. The network helps show where Nat Pernick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Nat Pernick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nat Pernick Line = papers co-authored together Nat Pernick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 200364
2 200357
3 198653
4
"Histiocytic markers" in melanoma.
199950
5 200344
6 200230
7 20097
8
A Data Management Program to Assist with Home Monitoring of Blood Glucose and Self Adjustment of Insulin Dosage for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Their Physicians
19845
9 20024
10 20004
11 20210

About Nat Pernick

Nat Pernick is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Cancer Research, having authored 11 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (1 paper), DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (95 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (93 citations), Dermatology (36 citations), Oncology (85 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (45 citations). Nat Pernick has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Rodbard, Volkan Adsay, Daniel W. Visscher, Kathryn A Carolin, John D. Crissman, Tracie Wallis, David L. Bouwman, Anthony F. Shields, Mary A. Kosir and Michael White. Their work appears in journals such as Pancreas, Modern Pathology, Diabetes Care, Medical Oncology and Annals of Surgical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact