Naseer Sangwan
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Physiology top 5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Pollution top 5%
- Food Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jack A. GilbertRup LalFangfang XiaCathryn R. NaglerAntonio CalignanoRosita AitoroRoberto Berni CananiRita Nocerino
- Topics
- Gut microbiota and health (44 papers)Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (21 papers)Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaChina
In The Last Decade
Naseer Sangwan
88 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
- Physiology 516
- Ecology 475
- Pollution 259
- Food Science 240
Countries citing papers authored by Naseer Sangwan
This map shows the geographic impact of Naseer Sangwan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naseer Sangwan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naseer Sangwan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naseer Sangwan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naseer Sangwan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naseer Sangwan. The network helps show where Naseer Sangwan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naseer Sangwan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naseer Sangwan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naseer Sangwan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naseer Sangwan. Naseer Sangwan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | A terminal metabolite of niacin promotes vascular inflammation and contributes to cardiovascular disease riskbreakdown → | 59 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 84 | |
| 13 | 72 | |
| 14 | 59 | |
| 15 | 65 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 217 | |
| 18 | 161 | |
| 19 | 52 | |
| 20 | Studies on residual effect of green manuring and farm yard manure for sustained productivity of rice-wheat-cropping sequence and on soil health under shallow groundwater table conditions | 2 |
About Naseer Sangwan
Naseer Sangwan is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology and Physiology, having authored 98 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gut microbiota and health (44 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (21 papers) and Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (74 citations), Immunology and Allergy (156 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.6k citations). Naseer Sangwan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and China. Frequent co-authors include Jack A. Gilbert, Rup Lal, Fangfang Xia, Cathryn R. Nagler, Antonio Calignano, Rosita Aitoro, Roberto Berni Canani, Rita Nocerino, Lorella Paparo and Andrew Stefka. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Nature Medicine and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.