Naoto Kamata
- Ecology top 5%
- Insect Science top 1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Andrew M. LiebholdYutaka IgarashiKei WadaSeiji OharaMitsuaki ShimazuHiroki SatoHayato MasuyaJun-ichi Nishida
- Topics
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management (44 papers)Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (21 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanThailandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Naoto Kamata
78 papers receiving 837 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Ecology 577
- Insect Science 455
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 237
- Plant Science 189
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 181
Countries citing papers authored by Naoto Kamata
This map shows the geographic impact of Naoto Kamata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naoto Kamata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naoto Kamata more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naoto Kamata
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naoto Kamata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naoto Kamata. The network helps show where Naoto Kamata may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naoto Kamata
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naoto Kamata. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naoto Kamata based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naoto Kamata. Naoto Kamata is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Environmental factors affecting the spatial distribution and activity of firefly larvae Luciola parvula (Coleoptera: Lampyridae: Luciolinae): high activity under rich soil moisture. | 3 |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | CLASSICAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF THE ELONGATE HEMLOCK SCALE, FIORINIA EXTERNA: 2004 ACTIVITIES | 1 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 64 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | Estimating the Density of Beech Caterpillar, Quadricalcarifera punctatella, by Frass Drop Samples | 1 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Naoto Kamata
Naoto Kamata is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 80 papers that have together received 905 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (44 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (21 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (455 citations), Ecology (577 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (181 citations). Naoto Kamata has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Thailand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew M. Liebhold, Yutaka Igarashi, Kei Wada, Seiji Ohara, Mitsuaki Shimazu, Hiroki Sato, Hayato Masuya, Jun-ichi Nishida, Jacob Thomas and Daisuke Kabeya. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Communications, Journal of Animal Ecology and Annals of Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.