Naomi Sager

59 total papers · 1.2k total citations
42 papers, 760 citations indexed

About

Naomi Sager is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology and Issues, ethics and legal aspects. According to data from OpenAlex, Naomi Sager has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 760 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 15 papers in Molecular Biology and 5 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects. Recurrent topics in Naomi Sager's work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (18 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (15 papers) and Topic Modeling (12 papers). Naomi Sager is often cited by papers focused on Natural Language Processing Techniques (18 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (15 papers) and Topic Modeling (12 papers). Naomi Sager collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Russia. Naomi Sager's co-authors include Margaret S. Lyman, Leo J. Tick, Ralph Grishman, Carol Friedman, Christine Bucknall, Lynette Hirschman, Elaine Marsh, F Borst, C Friedman and Jean-Raoul Scherrer and has published in prestigious journals such as Communications of the ACM, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and Information Processing & Management.

In The Last Decade

Naomi Sager

39 papers receiving 674 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Naomi Sager 603 371 102 44 41 42 760
Roger A. Côté 318 0.5× 358 1.0× 133 1.3× 53 1.2× 29 0.7× 21 655
Harold R. Solbrig 381 0.6× 409 1.1× 180 1.8× 26 0.6× 57 1.4× 71 660
Margaret S. Lyman 351 0.6× 368 1.0× 95 0.9× 14 0.3× 13 0.3× 29 827
W. A. Nowlan 584 1.0× 592 1.6× 279 2.7× 81 1.8× 80 2.0× 19 861
Hans Moen 464 0.8× 333 0.9× 76 0.7× 10 0.2× 27 0.7× 49 811
Harold M. Schoolman 271 0.4× 341 0.9× 62 0.6× 22 0.5× 26 0.6× 32 665
Philipp Daumke 376 0.6× 331 0.9× 126 1.2× 16 0.4× 49 1.2× 29 695
Mathias Brochhausen 335 0.6× 459 1.2× 108 1.1× 12 0.3× 57 1.4× 76 706
J R Scherrer 251 0.4× 248 0.7× 109 1.1× 23 0.5× 46 1.1× 54 831
Jacques Bouaud 344 0.6× 239 0.6× 173 1.7× 13 0.3× 32 0.8× 69 669

Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Sager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Sager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Sager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Sager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi Sager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Sager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Sager. The network helps show where Naomi Sager may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi Sager

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi Sager. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi Sager based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi Sager. Naomi Sager is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026