Naomi Pfeffer

40 total papers · 744 total citations
21 papers, 433 citations indexed

About

Naomi Pfeffer is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science and Reproductive Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Naomi Pfeffer has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 433 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Reproductive Medicine. Recurrent topics in Naomi Pfeffer's work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (5 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers). Naomi Pfeffer is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Health and Technologies (5 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers). Naomi Pfeffer collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Naomi Pfeffer's co-authors include Anna Coote, Julie Kent, Sophie Laws, Allyson M Pollock, Clare Moynihan, Barry L. Beyerstein, John Ruscio, Steven Jay Lynn, Scott O. Lilienfeld and Patricia A. Lohr and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Social Science & Medicine and Reproductive BioMedicine Online.

In The Last Decade

Naomi Pfeffer

21 papers receiving 378 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Naomi Pfeffer 92 83 82 76 59 21 433
Bethany A. Bell-Ellison 106 1.2× 108 1.3× 164 2.0× 99 1.3× 46 0.8× 12 440
Esmée Hanna 112 1.2× 164 2.0× 41 0.5× 96 1.3× 89 1.5× 34 492
Ying Wang 65 0.7× 64 0.8× 87 1.1× 57 0.8× 51 0.9× 18 383
Lene Koch 74 0.8× 117 1.4× 125 1.5× 69 0.9× 21 0.4× 28 451
Sorapop Kiatpongsan 120 1.3× 41 0.5× 88 1.1× 76 1.0× 15 0.3× 22 493
Rebecca Dimond 58 0.6× 49 0.6× 134 1.6× 113 1.5× 21 0.4× 30 457
Elmar Schlüter 155 1.7× 36 0.4× 22 0.3× 34 0.4× 34 0.6× 21 419
Leslie J. Reagan 124 1.3× 92 1.1× 111 1.4× 19 0.3× 58 1.0× 26 428
Rebecca Kaufman 104 1.1× 12 0.1× 49 0.6× 46 0.6× 76 1.3× 25 486
Caroline Lee 42 0.5× 20 0.2× 49 0.6× 112 1.5× 56 0.9× 26 489

Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Pfeffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Pfeffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Pfeffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Pfeffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi Pfeffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Pfeffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Pfeffer. The network helps show where Naomi Pfeffer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi Pfeffer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi Pfeffer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi Pfeffer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi Pfeffer. Naomi Pfeffer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026