Nancy A. Press

1.1k total citations
8 papers, 771 citations indexed

About

Nancy A. Press is a scholar working on Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nancy A. Press has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 771 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Genetics, 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 2 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Nancy A. Press's work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers). Nancy A. Press is often cited by papers focused on BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers). Nancy A. Press collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Nancy A. Press's co-authors include Wylie Burke, Linda Pinsky, Kim M. Nazi, Anaïs Tuepker, W. Paul Nichol, Erin Schwartz, Susan Woods, Carolyn Turvey, Sharon Durfy and Yutaka Yasui and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Patient Education and Counseling and Genetics in Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Nancy A. Press

8 papers receiving 735 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nancy A. Press United States	8	370	238	206	112	111	8	771
W. Andrew Faucett United States	17	622 1.7×	222 0.9×	169 0.8×	37 0.3×	135 1.2×	29	1.2k
Louise S. Acheson United States	20	828 2.2×	374 1.6×	300 1.5×	31 0.3×	176 1.6×	44	1.6k
F. Daniel Davis United States	13	216 0.6×	205 0.9×	210 1.0×	19 0.2×	53 0.5×	20	744
Amy A. Lemke United States	21	685 1.9×	578 2.4×	221 1.1×	15 0.1×	231 2.1×	36	1.3k
Herman Nys Belgium	18	360 1.0×	525 2.2×	275 1.3×	13 0.1×	373 3.4×	138	1.1k
Hazel Thornton United Kingdom	20	409 1.1×	372 1.6×	582 2.8×	10 0.1×	103 0.9×	44	1.5k
Sabina Gainotti Italy	14	148 0.4×	185 0.8×	88 0.4×	15 0.1×	33 0.3×	26	466
Juli Bollinger United States	16	426 1.2×	505 2.1×	172 0.8×	11 0.1×	68 0.6×	50	910
J. B. Silvers United States	14	176 0.5×	36 0.2×	143 0.7×	30 0.3×	234 2.1×	31	923
Megan C. Roberts United States	20	586 1.6×	287 1.2×	263 1.3×	12 0.1×	132 1.2×	96	1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy A. Press

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy A. Press's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy A. Press with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy A. Press more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy A. Press

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy A. Press. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy A. Press. The network helps show where Nancy A. Press may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy A. Press

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy A. Press. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy A. Press based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy A. Press. Nancy A. Press is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Burke, Wylie, Susan Brown Trinidad, & Nancy A. Press. (2013). Essential elements of personalized medicine. Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations. 32(2). 193–197. 35 indexed citations

2.

Burke, Wylie, Armand H. Matheny Antommaria, Robin L. Bennett, et al.. (2013). Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!. Genetics in Medicine. 15(11). 854–859. 214 indexed citations

3.

Woods, Susan, Erin Schwartz, Anaïs Tuepker, et al.. (2013). Patient Experiences With Full Electronic Access to Health Records and Clinical Notes Through the My HealtheVet Personal Health Record Pilot: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 15(3). e65–e65. 210 indexed citations

4.

Beskow, Laura M., Jeffrey R. Botkin, Mary B. Daly, et al.. (2004). Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 130A(4). 424–431. 46 indexed citations

5.

Burke, Wylie, Linda Pinsky, & Nancy A. Press. (2001). Categorizing genetic tests to identify their ethical, legal, and social implications. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 106(3). 233–240. 91 indexed citations

6.

Press, Nancy A., et al.. (2001). Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility may be based on unrealistic expectations. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 99(2). 99–110. 93 indexed citations

7.

Burke, Wylie, et al.. (2001). Misleading presentation of breast cancer in popular magazines.. PubMed. 4(2). 58–64. 33 indexed citations

8.

Browner, Carole H., et al.. (1996). The effects of ethnicity, education and an informational video on pregnant women's knowledge and decisions about a prenatal diagnostic screening test. Patient Education and Counseling. 27(2). 135–146. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact