NaNa Keum
- Oncology top 1%
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 15
- Cancer Risks and Factors 4
-
- Nutritional Studies and Diet 19
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 7
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
-
- Vitamin D Research Studies 5
- Physiology top 1%
- Nutrition and Health in Aging 15
- Physical Activity and Health 7
-
- Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism 5
- Co-authors
- Edward L. GiovannucciDarren C. GreenwoodDong Hoon LeeDagfinn AuneSerena TonstadTeresa NoratLars Thore FadnesElio Ríboli
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
NaNa Keum
54 papers receiving 6.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
- Oncology 1.7k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.7k
- Biological Psychiatry 138
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 963
- Physiology 1.4k
Countries citing papers authored by NaNa Keum
This map shows the geographic impact of NaNa Keum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by NaNa Keum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NaNa Keum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by NaNa Keum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by NaNa Keum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by NaNa Keum. The network helps show where NaNa Keum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside NaNa Keum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 8 | Vitamin D supplementation and total cancer incidence and mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsbreakdown → | 2019 | 243 |
| 9 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 42 | |
| 11 | Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategiesbreakdown → | 2019 | 1726 |
| 12 | 2018 | 62 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 128 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 81 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 82 | |
| 16 | Whole grain consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all cause and cause specific mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studiesbreakdown → | 2016 | 721 |
| 17 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 40 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 59 |
About NaNa Keum
NaNa Keum is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and Oncology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 6.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutritional Studies and Diet (19 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (15 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (15 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (7 papers), Physical Activity and Health (7 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (5 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (5 papers) and Cancer Risks and Factors (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.7k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.7k citations) and Biological Psychiatry (138 citations). NaNa Keum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Edward L. Giovannucci, Darren C. Greenwood, Dong Hoon Lee, Dagfinn Aune, Serena Tonstad, Teresa Norat, Lars Thore Fadnes, Elio Ríboli, Lars J. Vatten and Paolo Boffetta. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.