Najada Stringa
Impact in
- Aging top 10%
Papers in ⓘ
- Co-authors
- Martijn Huisman (10 shared papers)Natasja M. van Schoor (11 shared papers)Taulant Muka (3 shared papers)Oscar H. Franco (3 shared papers)M. Arfan Ikram (3 shared papers)Sven J. van der Lee (6 shared papers)Eralda Asllanaj (2 shared papers)Marcel Reinders (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journals of Gerontology Series A (2 papers)American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (1 paper)Alzheimer s & Dementia (1 paper)European Journal of Human Genetics (1 paper)Age and Ageing (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesBelarus
In The Last Decade
Najada Stringa
16 papers receiving 398 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Aging 28
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 13
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 33
- Health 59
- Physiology 103
Countries citing papers authored by Najada Stringa
This map shows the geographic impact of Najada Stringa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Najada Stringa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Najada Stringa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Najada Stringa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Najada Stringa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Najada Stringa. The network helps show where Najada Stringa may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Najada Stringa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 86 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 78 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 0 |
About Najada Stringa
Najada Stringa is a scholar working on Aging, Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Genetics and Neurology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (6 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (4 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers) and Nutrition and Health in Aging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (28 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (13 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (33 citations), Health (59 citations) and Physiology (103 citations). Najada Stringa has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Belarus. Frequent co-authors include Martijn Huisman, Natasja M. van Schoor, Taulant Muka, Oscar H. Franco, M. Arfan Ikram, Sven J. van der Lee, Eralda Asllanaj, Marcel Reinders, Henne Holstege and Marc Hulsman. Their work appears in journals such as The Journals of Gerontology Series A, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Alzheimer s & Dementia, European Journal of Human Genetics and Age and Ageing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.