Nagisa Oi
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Computational Mechanics
- Co-authors
- Masatoshi ImanishiYouichi OhyamaTakehiko WadaKohei IchikawaHideo MatsuharaMai ShirahataTakao NakagawaTakashi Onaka
- Topics
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (18 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (12 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (8 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Partner nations
- JapanTaiwanUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nagisa Oi
19 papers receiving 265 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 274
- Instrumentation 86
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 50
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 11
- Computational Mechanics 11
Countries citing papers authored by Nagisa Oi
This map shows the geographic impact of Nagisa Oi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nagisa Oi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nagisa Oi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nagisa Oi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nagisa Oi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nagisa Oi. The network helps show where Nagisa Oi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nagisa Oi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nagisa Oi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nagisa Oi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nagisa Oi. Nagisa Oi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 52 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 51 |
About Nagisa Oi
Nagisa Oi is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (18 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (12 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (86 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (274 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (50 citations). Nagisa Oi has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Taiwan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Masatoshi Imanishi, Youichi Ohyama, Takehiko Wada, Kohei Ichikawa, Hideo Matsuhara, Mai Shirahata, Takao Nakagawa, Takashi Onaka, Tomotsugu Goto and Matthew A. Malkan. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.