Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Naftale Katz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naftale Katz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naftale Katz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naftale Katz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naftale Katz. The network helps show where Naftale Katz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naftale Katz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naftale Katz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naftale Katz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Naftale Katz. Naftale Katz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Noronha, Dely, et al.. (1989). Curative and protective activity in rabbits after reinfection with Schistosoma mansoni: a new model of immunity?. PubMed. 75(2). 308–10.3 indexed citations
Gazzinelli, G., Naftale Katz, R. S. Rocha, & Daniel G. Colley. (1983). Immune responses during human Schistosomiasis mansoni. VIII. Differential in vitro cellular responsiveness to adult worm and schistosomular tegumental preparations.. PubMed. 32(2). 326–33.33 indexed citations
10.
Gazzinelli, Giovanni, Naftale Katz, Roberto Sena Rocha, & Daniel G. Colley. (1983). Immune Responses During Human Schistosomiasis Mansoni. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 32(2). 326–333.28 indexed citations
Katz, Naftale, et al.. (1981). [Reinfection of patients in endemic areas of schistosomiasis mansoni after specific treatment. IV--Observations in Belo Horizonte].. PubMed. 22(3). 97–107.4 indexed citations
Katz, Naftale, et al.. (1978). Re-infection of patients in schistosomiasis mansoni endemic areas after specific treatment. I--influence of age and worm burden.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 20(5). 273–8.29 indexed citations
15.
Zicker, Fábio, Naftale Katz, & Jeffrey C. Wolf. (1978). [Evaluation of the hatching test for eggs of Schistosoma mansoni].. PubMed. 19(3). 202–7.4 indexed citations
16.
Katz, Naftale, et al.. (1976). Clinical trials with oxamniquine, by oral route, in schistosomiasis mansoni.. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 18(5). 371–7.13 indexed citations
17.
Pellegrino, J. & Naftale Katz. (1975). [Experimental therapy of schistosomiasis. X. Diaminodiphenylsulfone (DDS) in experimental schistosomiasis].. PubMed. 17(3). 199–205.2 indexed citations
Katz, Naftale, et al.. (1972). Study of the effects of gamma-radiation on eggs and miracidia of Schistosoma mansoni.. PubMed. 13(6). 383–6.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.