Nadja-Raphaela Baer
- Pharmacy top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- General Health Professions
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Steffi G. Riedel‐HellerH.‐H. KönigJenny SpahlholzClaudia Luck‐SikorskiLiane SchenkClaudia SikorskiMelanie LuppaGeorg Schomerus
- Topics
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers)Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers)Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONENutrientsObesity Reviews
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Nadja-Raphaela Baer
13 papers receiving 341 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Pharmacy 208
- Clinical Psychology 180
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 118
- General Health Professions 61
- Surgery 43
Countries citing papers authored by Nadja-Raphaela Baer
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadja-Raphaela Baer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadja-Raphaela Baer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadja-Raphaela Baer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadja-Raphaela Baer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadja-Raphaela Baer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadja-Raphaela Baer. The network helps show where Nadja-Raphaela Baer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadja-Raphaela Baer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadja-Raphaela Baer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadja-Raphaela Baer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadja-Raphaela Baer. Nadja-Raphaela Baer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | Obesity and discrimination – a systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studiesbreakdown → | 270 |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | Despite some PR fallout, proponents say MD walkouts increase awareness and may improve health care. | 6 |
About Nadja-Raphaela Baer
Nadja-Raphaela Baer is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Applied Psychology and Demography, having authored 13 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (208 citations), Clinical Psychology (180 citations) and Applied Psychology (23 citations). Nadja-Raphaela Baer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Steffi G. Riedel‐Heller, H.‐H. König, Jenny Spahlholz, Claudia Luck‐Sikorski, Liane Schenk, Claudia Sikorski, Melanie Luppa, Georg Schomerus, Manuela M. Bergmann and Roma Schmitz. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Nutrients and Obesity Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.