Nadine E. Smith
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Papers in
-
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 4
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 3
-
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research 2
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes 2
- Co-authors
- Tony Butler (4 shared papers)John Basson (2 shared papers)Stephen Allnutt (2 shared papers)Gavin Andrews (2 shared papers)Chika Sakashita (2 shared papers)Stephanie Hollis (2 shared papers)Peter W. Schofield (2 shared papers)Stephen J. Lee (2 shared papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Nadine E. Smith
7 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Clinical Psychology 176
- Emergency Medicine 33
- Epidemiology 106
- Psychiatry and Mental health 42
- Health 18
Countries citing papers authored by Nadine E. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadine E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadine E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadine E. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadine E. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadine E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadine E. Smith. The network helps show where Nadine E. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Nadine E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 181 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 81 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 44 | |
| 4 | Comorbid Substance and Non-substance Mental Health Disorders and Re-offending among NSW Prisoners | 2010 | 24 |
| 5 | 2006 | 23 | |
| 6 | Monitoring Trends in Re-offending among Adult and Juvenile Offenders Given Non-custodial Sanctions | 2008 | 9 |
| 7 | Monitoring Trends in Re-offending among Offenders Released from Prison | 2008 | 3 |
| 8 | Does Receiving an Amphetamine Charge Increase the Likelihood of a Future Violent Charge | 2009 | 1 |
About Nadine E. Smith
Nadine E. Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Neurology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (176 citations), Emergency Medicine (33 citations), Epidemiology (106 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (42 citations) and Health (18 citations). Nadine E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tony Butler, John Basson, Stephen Allnutt, Gavin Andrews, Chika Sakashita, Stephanie Hollis, Peter W. Schofield, Stephen J. Lee, Wendy Kelso and Craig Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry and Brain Injury.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.