Nadine Bremeyer
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 7
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods 5
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms 5
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 5
- Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions 2
- Catalytic Alkyne Reactions 2
- Inorganic Chemistry top 5%
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis 3
- Pharmaceutical Science top 5%
-
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 2
- Co-authors
- Matthew J. GauntStephen C. SmithSteven V. LeyCarin C. C. JohanssonVince S. C. YehBarry M. TrostElise CahardDafydd R. Owen
- Journals
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition (4 papers)Organic Letters (1 paper)Organic Process Research & Development (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Nadine Bremeyer
15 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Organic Chemistry 966
- Inorganic Chemistry 235
- Pharmaceutical Science 60
- Process Chemistry and Technology 17
- Spectroscopy 62
Countries citing papers authored by Nadine Bremeyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadine Bremeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadine Bremeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadine Bremeyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadine Bremeyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadine Bremeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadine Bremeyer. The network helps show where Nadine Bremeyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadine Bremeyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 95 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 117 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 171 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 51 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 145 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 46 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 228 |
About Nadine Bremeyer
Nadine Bremeyer is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (7 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (5 papers), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (5 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (5 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (3 papers), Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and Catalytic Alkyne Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (966 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (235 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (60 citations). Nadine Bremeyer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Matthew J. Gaunt, Stephen C. Smith, Steven V. Ley, Carin C. C. Johansson, Vince S. C. Yeh, Barry M. Trost, Elise Cahard, Dafydd R. Owen, Matthew Tredwell and Beatrice S. L. Collins. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Organic Letters and Organic Process Research & Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.