Nádia Roque

3.6k citations
105 papers · 883 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Nádia Roque

99 papers receiving 851 citations

Peers

Nádia Roque
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 454
  • Cancer Research 276
  • Plant Science 340
  • Drug Discovery 1
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 71
Replace L. Ariza Espinar with:
L. Ariza Espinar Argentina
Theophanis Constantinidis Greece
Francesco María Raimondo Italy
Denise María Trombert Oliveira Brazil
Mostafa Assadi Iran
A. Michael Powell United States
Kuddisi Ertuğrul Türkiye
Muhammad Qaiser Pakistan
Stephen L. Jury United Kingdom
Lowell E. Urbatsch United States
Nádia Roque relative to L. Ariza Espinar Argentina L. Ariza Espinar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
L. Ariza Espinar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nádia Roque

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nádia Roque's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nádia Roque with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nádia Roque more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nádia Roque

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nádia Roque. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nádia Roque. The network helps show where Nádia Roque may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nádia Roque, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nádia Roque Line = papers co-authored together Nádia Roque links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202042
2 201939
3 199237
4 201434
5 201728
6
Antimicrobial activity of kaurenoic acid derivatives substituted on carbon-15.
198928
7 201328
8 201925
9 201624
10 201823
11 202021
12 200821
13 199721
14 201320
15 201117
16 201117
17 200117
18 201316
19 201916
20 201514

About Nádia Roque

Nádia Roque is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cancer Research, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Food Science, having authored 105 papers that have together received 883 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (49 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (46 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (31 papers), Plant and animal studies (26 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (18 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (15 papers), Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (12 papers) and Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (454 citations), Cancer Research (276 citations), Plant Science (340 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (71 citations). Nádia Roque has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Vicki A. Funk, José Rubens Pirani, Gisela Sancho, Pedro Acevedo‐Rodríguez, Astréa Mennucci Giesbrecht, Marcelo J. P. Ferreira, Thaís Vasconcelos, Letícia V. Costa‐Lotufo, Jimi Naoki Nakajima and Maria Lenise Silva Guedes. Their work appears in journals such as Phytotaxa, Rodriguésia, Systematic Botany, Taxon and Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact