Nadia Moraes‐Barros
- Paleontology top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- João Stenghel MorganteMariella SuperinaJacob EnkGillian C. GibbHendrik N. PoinarFrédéric DelsucFabien L. CondamineMelanie Kuch
- Topics
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies (15 papers)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers)Genetic diversity and population structure (7 papers)
- Journals
- Molecular Biology and EvolutionBiodiversity and ConservationBiological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Partner nations
- BrazilPortugalUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nadia Moraes‐Barros
19 papers receiving 486 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Paleontology 309
- Ecology 206
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 203
- Genetics 115
- Molecular Biology 84
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Moraes‐Barros
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Moraes‐Barros's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Moraes‐Barros with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Moraes‐Barros more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Moraes‐Barros
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Moraes‐Barros. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Moraes‐Barros. The network helps show where Nadia Moraes‐Barros may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Moraes‐Barros
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Moraes‐Barros. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Moraes‐Barros based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Moraes‐Barros. Nadia Moraes‐Barros is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 173 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 45 |
About Nadia Moraes‐Barros
Nadia Moraes‐Barros is a scholar working on Paleontology, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Paleontology Studies (15 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (309 citations), Ecological Modeling (63 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (203 citations). Nadia Moraes‐Barros has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Portugal and United States. Frequent co-authors include João Stenghel Morgante, Mariella Superina, Jacob Enk, Gillian C. Gibb, Hendrik N. Poinar, Frédéric Delsuc, Fabien L. Condamine, Melanie Kuch, Juliana Almeida and Sofia Marques Silva. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Biology and Evolution, Biodiversity and Conservation and Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.