Nadia Dandachi
- Oncology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Co-authors
- Cornelia Hauser‐KronbergerMarija BalićHellmut SamoniggOtto DietzeThomas BauernhoferRichard J. CôtéStefanie StanzerPeter Regitnig
- Topics
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (19 papers)Cancer Cells and Metastasis (14 papers)Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (10 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- AustriaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Nadia Dandachi
55 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Oncology 799
- Molecular Biology 565
- Cancer Research 508
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 215
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 181
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Dandachi
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Dandachi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Dandachi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Dandachi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Dandachi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Dandachi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Dandachi. The network helps show where Nadia Dandachi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Dandachi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Dandachi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Dandachi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Dandachi. Nadia Dandachi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 84 | |
| 14 | 47 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | Cancer metastasis: advances in the detection and characterization of disseminated tumour cells facilitate clinical translation. | 10 |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | Evaluation of the clinical significance of HER2 amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridisation in patients with primary breast cancer. | 20 |
| 20 | 101 |
About Nadia Dandachi
Nadia Dandachi is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (19 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (14 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (508 citations), Oncology (799 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (74 citations). Nadia Dandachi has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Cornelia Hauser‐Kronberger, Marija Balić, Hellmut Samonigg, Otto Dietze, Thomas Bauernhofer, Richard J. Côté, Stefanie Stanzer, Peter Regitnig, Ellen Heitzer and Christoph Ausch. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.