Nadia Caplan

439 citations
10 papers · 252 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers 3
    • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management 1
    • Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis 1

Nadia Caplan

10 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

Nadia Caplan
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Health Informatics 13
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 121
  • Oncology 59
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 42
  • Radiation 16
Replace Seiichi Murakami with:
Seiichi Murakami Japan
Zijian Zhou United States
Ran Gu China
Masoumeh Gity Iran
Rongpin Wang China
Peter Dankerl Germany
Mazen Soufi Japan
Xiaofeng Jiang China
Matteo Pepa Italy
Nadia Caplan relative to Seiichi Murakami Japan Seiichi Murakami's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Seiichi Murakami · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Caplan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Caplan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Caplan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Caplan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Caplan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Caplan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Caplan. The network helps show where Nadia Caplan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Caplan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadia Caplan Line = papers co-authored together Nadia Caplan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2018135
2 202030
3 202130
4 201820
5 202111
6 202111
7 20178
8
Agents with tricyclic structures for treating peptic ulcer disease.
19833
9 20242
10 20202

About Nadia Caplan

Nadia Caplan is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Immunology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (3 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (3 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (2 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (2 papers), Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (1 paper), Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (1 paper), Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis (1 paper) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (13 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (121 citations), Oncology (59 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (42 citations) and Radiation (16 citations). Nadia Caplan has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Jacob Sosna, Leo Joskowicz, Dalia Cohen, Marina Orevi, Michal Lotem, Jonathan Cohen, Aron Popovtzer, Sharon Merims, Alexander Yakobson and Stephen Jay Frank. Their work appears in journals such as European Radiology, Frontiers in Oncology, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact