Nadège Vernet
- Molecular Biology
- Reproductive Medicine top 1%
- Genetics top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Immunology
- Co-authors
- Norbert B. GhyselinckManuel MarkChristine DennefeldPierre ChambonMustapha Oulad‐AbdelghaniMarius TeletinBetty FéretCécile Rochette‐Egly
- Topics
- Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (18 papers)Sperm and Testicular Function (12 papers)Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (10 papers)
- Journals
- The EMBO JournalPLoS ONEDevelopment
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nadège Vernet
22 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Molecular Biology 657
- Reproductive Medicine 541
- Genetics 540
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 332
- Immunology 70
Countries citing papers authored by Nadège Vernet
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadège Vernet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadège Vernet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadège Vernet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadège Vernet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadège Vernet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadège Vernet. The network helps show where Nadège Vernet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadège Vernet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadège Vernet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadège Vernet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadège Vernet. Nadège Vernet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 39 | |
| 5 | 48 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 55 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 41 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 47 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | 175 | |
| 18 | 93 | |
| 19 | 67 | |
| 20 | 208 |
About Nadège Vernet
Nadège Vernet is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (18 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (12 papers) and Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (541 citations), Genetics (540 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (332 citations). Nadège Vernet has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Norbert B. Ghyselinck, Manuel Mark, Christine Dennefeld, Pierre Chambon, Mustapha Oulad‐Abdelghani, Marius Teletin, Betty Féret, Cécile Rochette‐Egly, Paul S. Burgoyne and Shantha K. Mahadevaiah. Their work appears in journals such as The EMBO Journal, PLoS ONE and Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.