Naama Shafran

432 total citations
11 papers, 243 citations indexed

About

Naama Shafran is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Naama Shafran has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 243 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 1 paper in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Naama Shafran's work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (6 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers). Naama Shafran is often cited by papers focused on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (6 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers). Naama Shafran collaborates with scholars based in Israel, United States and Japan. Naama Shafran's co-authors include Eva Gilboa‐Schechtman, Idan M. Aderka, Lilach Rachamim, Elna Yadin, Alan Apter, Mark B. Powers, Edna B. Foa, Edna B. Foa, Eshkol Rafaeli and Golan Shahar and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Naama Shafran

10 papers receiving 231 citations

Peers

Naama Shafran

CP

ECP

EPIDE

SP

GHP

Emma Lockwood Australia

Nitsa Nacasch Israel

Jason José Bendezú United States

Sonia M. Shah United States

Hannah Murray United Kingdom

Lilach Rachamim Israel

Martin Steppan Switzerland

Sally Jowett United Kingdom

Lucas Zullo United States

Nasrin Jaberghaderi Iran

Emma Lockwood Australia

Naama Shafran

303 ×1.4

CP

27 ×0.6

ECP

33 ×0.9

EPIDE

37 ×1.6

SP

34 ×2.0

GHP

Citations per year, relative to Naama Shafran Naama Shafran (= 1×) peers Emma Lockwood

Countries citing papers authored by Naama Shafran

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naama Shafran's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naama Shafran with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naama Shafran more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naama Shafran

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naama Shafran. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naama Shafran. The network helps show where Naama Shafran may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naama Shafran

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naama Shafran. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naama Shafran based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naama Shafran. Naama Shafran is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Shafran, Naama, et al.. (2021). Wie Abschied nehmen?. Familiendynamik. 46(2). 92–107. 1 indexed citations

2.

Shafran, Naama, et al.. (2019). The final session of psychodynamic psychotherapy for satisfied and unsatisfied clients who initiate the end of treatment. Counselling Psychology Quarterly. 33(4). 583–597. 1 indexed citations

3.

Shafran, Naama, et al.. (2018). Teach them how to say goodbye: The CMRA model for treatment endings.. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. 28(3). 385–400. 5 indexed citations

4.

Shafran, Naama, Golan Shahar, Ety Berant, & Eva Gilboa‐Schechtman. (2015). Representations of Self and Parents, and Relationship Themes, in Adolescents with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 44(5). 887–899. 6 indexed citations

5.

Aderka, Idan M., et al.. (2011). Sudden gains in prolonged exposure for children and adolescents with posttraumatic stress disorder.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 79(4). 441–446. 42 indexed citations

6.

Gilboa‐Schechtman, Eva, Naama Shafran, & Edna B. Foa. (2011). Drs. Gilboa-Schechtman et al. reply. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 50(5). 522–524. 2 indexed citations

7.

Aderka, Idan M., et al.. (2011). Direction of influence between posttraumatic and depressive symptoms during prolonged exposure therapy among children and adolescents.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 79(3). 421–425. 45 indexed citations

8.

Gilboa‐Schechtman, Eva, Edna B. Foa, Naama Shafran, et al.. (2010). Prolonged Exposure Versus Dynamic Therapy for Adolescent PTSD: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 49(10). 1034–1042. 130 indexed citations

9.

Rachamim, Lilach, et al.. (2009). Exposure-based therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adults.. PubMed. 46(4). 274–81. 7 indexed citations

10.

Shafran, Naama, et al.. (2003). A Sense of Belonging: A Tracer Study of ALMAYA's Parents Cooperative Kindergarten, Israel. Early Childhood Development: Practice and Reflections. Following Footsteps.. 1 indexed citations

11.

Shafran, Naama, et al.. (2003). A sense of belonging : a trancer study of ALMAYA's parents cooperative kindergarten, Israel. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact