Idan M. Aderka
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Maya AsherEva Gilboa‐SchechtmanStefan G. HofmannAngela NickersonÞröstur BjörgvinssonSarah J. KertzHaggai HermeshKatrina McCoy
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (67 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (42 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (35 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONENeuroImageScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- IsraelUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Idan M. Aderka
90 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Clinical Psychology 2.5k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.5k
- Social Psychology 720
- Sociology and Political Science 472
- Cognitive Neuroscience 410
Countries citing papers authored by Idan M. Aderka
This map shows the geographic impact of Idan M. Aderka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Idan M. Aderka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Idan M. Aderka more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Idan M. Aderka
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Idan M. Aderka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Idan M. Aderka. The network helps show where Idan M. Aderka may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Idan M. Aderka
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Idan M. Aderka. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Idan M. Aderka based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Idan M. Aderka. Idan M. Aderka is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 116 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | Psychometric Properties of the CES-D-10 in a Psychiatric Samplebreakdown → | 518 |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 237 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 164 | |
| 18 | 85 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 42 |
About Idan M. Aderka
Idan M. Aderka is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 96 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (67 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (42 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (35 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.5k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k citations) and Applied Psychology (295 citations). Idan M. Aderka has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Maya Asher, Eva Gilboa‐Schechtman, Stefan G. Hofmann, Angela Nickerson, Þröstur Björgvinsson, Sarah J. Kertz, Haggai Hermesh, Katrina McCoy, Anu Asnaani and Sofi Marom. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.