Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Using a Deep Learning Algorithm and Integrated Gradients Explanation to Assist Grading for Diabetic Retinopathy
2018250 citationsRory Sayres, Ankur Taly et al.Ophthalmologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Naama Hammel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naama Hammel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naama Hammel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naama Hammel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naama Hammel. The network helps show where Naama Hammel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naama Hammel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naama Hammel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naama Hammel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Naama Hammel. Naama Hammel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Al‐Aswad, Lama A., Rithambara Ramachandran, Joel S. Schuman, et al.. (2022). Artificial Intelligence for Glaucoma. Ophthalmology Glaucoma. 5(5). e16–e25.13 indexed citations
6.
Hammel, Naama, Mike Schaekermann, Sonia Phene, et al.. (2019). A Study of Feature-based Consensus Formation for Glaucoma Risk Assessment. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 60(9). 164–164.1 indexed citations
Hammel, Naama, Akram Belghith, Felipe A. Medeiros, et al.. (2016). Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS): Comparing the Rates of Macular Ganglion Cell layer loss in Healthy, non-progressing Glaucoma and progressing glaucoma Eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(12). 373–373.2 indexed citations
Hammel, Naama, Akram Belghith, Felipe A. Medeiros, et al.. (2015). Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS): Comparing the Rates of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber layer and Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Loss in Healthy and Glaucoma Eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 56(7). 4568–4568.1 indexed citations
15.
Sharpsten, Lucie, Felipe A. Medeiros, Naira Khachatryan, et al.. (2014). Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS): Diagnostic Accuracy of the Spectralis Normative Database in Differentiating between Healthy and Early Visual Field Defect Eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 4773–4773.
16.
Miki, Atsuya, Linda M. Zangwill, Sonia Jain, et al.. (2013). Rates of retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in glaucoma suspect eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 1706–1706.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.