Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Automated Diagnosis of Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
2018396 citationsJames M. Brown, J. Peter Campbell et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Susan Ostmo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan Ostmo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan Ostmo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan Ostmo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan Ostmo. The network helps show where Susan Ostmo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan Ostmo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan Ostmo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan Ostmo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Susan Ostmo. Susan Ostmo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Singh, Praveer, J. Peter Campbell, Susan Ostmo, et al.. (2021). External validation of a deep learning algorithm for plus disease classification on a multinational ROP dataset. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 62(8). 3266–3266.
Campbell, J. Peter, et al.. (2020). Automated Assessment of Stage in Retinopathy of Prematurity using Deep Learning. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 61(7). 2775–2775.1 indexed citations
11.
Dy, Jennifer, Deniz Erdoğmuş, Jayashree Kalpathy–Cramer, et al.. (2020). Fast and Accurate Ranking Regression.. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 77–88.3 indexed citations
Campbell, J. Peter, Ryan Swan, Karyn Jonas, et al.. (2017). Implementation and evaluation of a tele-education system for the diagnosis of ophthalmic disease by international trainees.. PubMed. 2015. 366–75.23 indexed citations
15.
Kalpathy–Cramer, Jayashree, J. Peter Campbell, Sang Kim, et al.. (2017). Deep learning for the identification of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 5554–5554.2 indexed citations
16.
Kang, Kai B., Samir Patel, Karyn Jonas, et al.. (2016). Characterization of Errors in Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) Diagnosis by International Ophthalmology Residents. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(12).2 indexed citations
Fink, Cassandra, et al.. (2013). The Incidence of Retinopathy of Prematurity in Armenia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 595–595.2 indexed citations
20.
Ostmo, Susan, et al.. (2013). Armenian ROP EyeCare Project: Agreement Between Ophthalmoscopic Diagnosis by Newly Trained Local Ophthalmologists vs. Remote Image-Based Diagnosis by Experts. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 599–599.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.