N. Williams

30 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers

N. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Transplantation 64
  • Family Practice 17
  • Speech and Hearing 27
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Animal Science and Zoology 25
Replace Annie Lahoche with:
Annie Lahoche France
Tatenda Mupfudze United States
Olivia Shaw United Kingdom
Amy Garee United States
Meriç Yavuz Çolak Türkiye
Ulrika L. Fagerberg Sweden
Réme Mountifield Australia
Jennifer Vittorio United States
Matthew Paek United States
Hani Akoury Canada
N. Williams relative to Annie Lahoche France Annie Lahoche's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Annie Lahoche · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Williams. The network helps show where N. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Williams Line = papers co-authored together N. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200464
2 202046
3 201742
4 199923
5 201518
6 202114
7 201914
8 202110
9 20177
10 20197
11 20177
12 20086
13 20216
14 20206
15 20124
16 20204
17 20213
18 20213
19 20232
20
Minimal clinically important differences of the expanded hammersmith functional motor scale in later-onset spinal muscular atrophy: Results from the Phase 3 CHERISH trial
20192

About N. Williams

N. Williams is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Epidemiology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 31 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (11 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (5 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (4 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (4 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (4 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (4 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (64 citations), Family Practice (17 citations), Speech and Hearing (27 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation) and Animal Science and Zoology (25 citations). N. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stuart C. Sweet, Lara Danziger‐Isakov, Don Hayes, Gregory A. Storch, M.G. Schecter, Samuel Goldfarb, Ernestina Melicoff, Gary Visner, C. Conrad and Albert Faro. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Transplantation, Pediatric Transplantation, Annals of Oncology, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation and Radiotherapy and Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact