N. Liu

552 total citations
11 papers, 195 citations indexed

About

N. Liu is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, N. Liu has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 195 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 4 papers in Developmental Neuroscience and 3 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Recurrent topics in N. Liu's work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (6 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (4 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers). N. Liu is often cited by papers focused on Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (6 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (4 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers). N. Liu collaborates with scholars based in France, China and Belgium. N. Liu's co-authors include Thierry Chazot, Marc Fischler, Emmanuel Samain, M. Mercier, Guillaume Besch, Sébastien Pili‐Floury, N. Boichut, K. Sievert, Bernard Trillat and Marc De Kock and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Resuscitation and Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

In The Last Decade

N. Liu

9 papers receiving 187 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
N. Liu France 7 117 92 89 55 49 11 195
Rogean Rodrigues Nunes Brazil 9 105 0.9× 75 0.8× 67 0.8× 59 1.1× 42 0.9× 39 232
L. D. Paxton United Kingdom 8 161 1.4× 195 2.1× 74 0.8× 43 0.8× 33 0.7× 13 297
O. Tirel France 7 182 1.6× 92 1.0× 70 0.8× 96 1.7× 53 1.1× 8 241
Alain Rémy France 9 53 0.5× 124 1.3× 127 1.4× 13 0.2× 22 0.4× 18 233
Réka Nemes Hungary 11 277 2.4× 195 2.1× 109 1.2× 99 1.8× 83 1.7× 28 354
N. Boichut France 7 226 1.9× 174 1.9× 105 1.2× 122 2.2× 96 2.0× 8 334
G. Rodney United Kingdom 4 83 0.7× 73 0.8× 71 0.8× 22 0.4× 23 0.5× 4 164
Indu Kapoor India 9 49 0.4× 75 0.8× 55 0.6× 51 0.9× 43 0.9× 50 215
Donald M. Mathews United States 10 153 1.3× 157 1.7× 115 1.3× 63 1.1× 64 1.3× 39 318
Caroline Vanpeteghem Belgium 7 97 0.8× 121 1.3× 66 0.7× 23 0.4× 16 0.3× 16 189

Countries citing papers authored by N. Liu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Liu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Liu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Liu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Liu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Liu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Liu. The network helps show where N. Liu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Liu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Liu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Liu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. Liu. N. Liu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
2.
Cividjian, Andrei, Fabrice Petitjeans, N. Liu, et al.. (2017). Do we feel pain during anesthesia? A critical review on surgery-evoked circulatory changes and pain perception. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 31(4). 445–467. 31 indexed citations
3.
Restoux, A., Stanislas Grassin‐Delyle, N. Liu, et al.. (2016). Pilot study of closed-loop anaesthesia for liver transplantation. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 117(3). 332–340. 6 indexed citations
4.
Gayat, Étienne, Nicolas Mongardon, K. Sievert, et al.. (2012). CNAP® does not reliably detect minimal or maximal arterial blood pressures during induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 57(4). 468–473. 22 indexed citations
5.
Besch, Guillaume, N. Liu, Emmanuel Samain, et al.. (2011). Occurrence of and risk factors for electroencephalogram burst suppression during propofol–remifentanil anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 107(5). 749–756. 60 indexed citations
7.
Beydon, L., Jean‐Claude Desfontis, J. Petres, et al.. (2009). BIS response to tamponade and dobutamine in swine varies with hypnotic/opiate ratio. Annales Françaises d Anesthésie et de Réanimation. 28(7-8). 650–657. 4 indexed citations
8.
Liu, N., Thierry Chazot, Bernard Trillat, Guy A. Dumont, & Marc Fischler. (2007). Titration automatisée du propofol guidée par l'index bispectral. Annales Françaises d Anesthésie et de Réanimation. 26(10). 850–854. 7 indexed citations
9.
Tremey, Benjamin, Barbara Székély, S. Schlumberger, et al.. (2006). Anticoagulation monitoring during vascular surgery: accuracy of the Hemochron ® low range activated clotting time (ACT-LR). British Journal of Anaesthesia. 97(4). 453–459. 22 indexed citations
10.
Liu, N., Thierry Chazot, Bernard Trillat, et al.. (2006). Feasibility of closed-loop titration of propofol guided by the Bispectral Index for general anaesthesia induction. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 23(6). 465–469. 35 indexed citations
11.
Yin-ming, Zeng, et al.. (1982). Hemodynamic studies of the effect of total alkaloids of Datura in experimental hemorrhagic shock in dogs. Resuscitation. 10(2). 129–133. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026